Defective products and toxic exposure

Manufacturing defects: The Road To a Successful Product Liability Case

By Million Dollar Lawyer Editorial Team · Updated

Manufacturing defect factory picture of woman

When a product that works fine for everyone else fails the one time it matters, and you’re the one who gets hurt, it’s natural to wonder whether it was bad luck, your own doing or the product. If you’re not sure you even have a case, that’s normal.

Here’s the plain answer. A manufacturing defect is a flaw in how your particular unit was made: it didn’t come out of production the way the maker designed it. To recover, you generally have to show that the product was defective when it left the defendant’s control and that the defect caused your injury (in Michigan, M Civ JI 25.22, 25.32). The product itself is usually your best evidence, so keep it, unrepaired. In Michigan, you generally have three years to sue (MCL 600.5805(12)).

The obstacle is usually the claims process, not the facts: the maker’s insurer handles claims like yours every day, the key evidence is easy to lose, and the deadline runs while you recover. For product claims in general, see our complete product liability guide. Michigan’s rules are in the boxes marked “In Michigan.”

Hurt by a product that failed when it shouldn't have? Get a free case review. Four quick questions, no cost, no obligation.

What is a manufacturing defect?

A manufacturing defect happens in production, so only some units of a product are flawed, such as yours or one batch, while the rest are fine (Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute, or LII). In the Michigan Supreme Court’s words, such a product “is not in its intended condition,” and it “may be evaluated against the manufacturer’s own production standards, as manifested by that manufacturer’s other like products” (Prentis v Yale Manufacturing Co, 1984).

  • A made-up example: a new electric kettle shocks its owner the first time she fills it. A wire inside her kettle was pinched against the metal body during assembly. Kettles assembled correctly don’t have that fault, and that comparison is the heart of her claim.
  • Another made-up example: a machine setting drifts during one production run, so some bicycle forks are welded weaker than specified, and one snaps on an ordinary ride.

A design defect is different: it’s in the plan itself, so every unit shares it (how design defect claims work). So is a warning defect, where users weren’t given the warnings or instructions they needed (the three types of product defects). The label matters: in Michigan, a design claim against the maker is judged by a negligence, risk-utility test (Prentis). Not hurt? See your options when a defective product hasn’t injured you.

How do you prove a manufacturing defect?

Four kinds of evidence usually show what went wrong, and when.

Start with the product itself

Keep it as it was, with every piece and the packaging, and don’t repair or clean it (the checklist below lists what else to keep). If the maker, the seller or an insurer asks to take it “for inspection,” get advice first: an inspection should happen with everyone on notice and a record of what was done (how to preserve evidence).

Testing and experts

An engineer, a metallurgist or another qualified expert can examine and test the product and explain what failed. Testing that could change or destroy it should wait until everyone involved has notice and a chance to attend. Experts help, but they aren’t always required: the Michigan Supreme Court has held that “a manufacturing defect can be proved by circumstantial evidence without expert opinion testimony” (Holloway v General Motors Corp, 1978). In Michigan, a judge decides whether a scientific opinion “is reliable and will assist the trier of fact” before a jury hears it (MCL 600.2955(1)).

Comparison with units that were made right

Because a manufacturing flaw is measured against the maker’s own production standards, as shown by its other units (Prentis), comparison is central: your unit against the maker’s specifications, its inspection records and properly made units, ideally from the same batch. When a bad batch hurts many people, their claims may be brought together (how class actions and mass torts work).

Recall records and other people’s reports

Reports from other owners can show whether your failure is a one-off or part of a pattern.

  • Consumer products: SaferProducts.gov, the public database of the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), holds reports of harm and recall information (15 U.S.C. § 2055a(b)(1); 84 Fed. Reg. 3134). If you file a report, the CPSC generally sends it to the maker (15 U.S.C. § 2055a(c)(1)), so stick to the facts.
  • Vehicles: check your vehicle identification number (VIN) with the recall lookup of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA); large automakers must send NHTSA their VIN-searchable recall data for its websites (49 C.F.R. § 573.15). NHTSA’s public complaints file contains every safety-related defect complaint it has received since January 1, 1995 (NHTSA, complaints data file).

Treat these as leads, not proof: by law, the CPSC must tell users that it doesn’t guarantee the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of its database (15 U.S.C. § 2055a(b)(5)), and a recall doesn’t prove that your unit was defective. See what a recall means for your claim.

When the product is gone, or no one can pinpoint the flaw

When the product is lost or the exact flaw can’t be found, many courts let a jury infer a defect from the circumstances. The Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability, an American Law Institute treatise that courts often cite but that isn’t binding (LII), allows the inference “without proof of a specific defect” when the incident “was of a kind that ordinarily occurs as a result of a product defect” and “was not, in the particular case, solely the result of causes other than product defect existing at the time of sale or distribution” (§ 3, as quoted by New Jersey’s Supreme Court in adopting it, Myrlak v Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, 1999). Connecticut’s Supreme Court noted in 2011 that most states have adopted some form of this “malfunction theory,” but that “proof of an accident alone is insufficient” and an older product can weaken the inference (Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co v Deere & Co).

Still have the product, or worried it's already gone? Get a free case review. Four quick questions, no cost, no obligation.

Who can be held responsible for a manufacturing defect?

Anyone in the chain from factory to store can be: the maker of a component part, the company that assembled the product, the wholesaler and the retailer (LII). Where the flaw entered matters: if the wire in the made-up kettle example was pinched during assembly, the company that assembled the kettle is a likely target.

Is the maker strictly liable for a manufacturing defect?

In many states, yes. Product liability is generally treated as strict liability: if the product was defective and the defect caused the harm, it doesn’t matter how careful the maker was (LII). In Ohio, for example, a product that “deviated in a material way” from the maker’s specifications when it left the maker’s control can be defective “even though its manufacturer exercised all possible care” (Ohio Rev. Code § 2307.74). Michigan works differently.

What if the maker says it was your fault?

Expect to hear that you misused or changed the product, that it wore out, or that you knew the risk. You don’t have to prove you were unaware of the hazard, but depending on the state and the facts, arguments like these can reduce what you recover or, in some cases, defeat the claim.

How long do you have to file a claim?

Every state sets its own deadline; see injury deadlines in every state.

What should you keep? A checklist

  • The product and every piece of it, unrepaired and uncleaned, stored out of use.
  • The box, labels and manual, especially any model, serial or lot number and date code.
  • Proof of purchase, such as a receipt or card statement.
  • Photos and video of the product, the scene and your injuries, and witnesses’ names.
  • Your medical records and bills, and proof of missed work.
  • Every letter, email or recall notice from the maker, the seller or an insurer, and your written notice to the seller.

What to do next

  1. Get medical care, and keep every record. Tell each provider what product was involved.
  2. Secure the product as it is. Don’t repair or use it, and get advice before anyone takes it apart or takes it away.
  3. Write down what happened while it’s fresh, including how long you’d had the product and how it was used and maintained.
  4. Check for recalls, and notify the seller in writing if you bought the product. Don’t give a recorded statement or sign a release before you’ve had advice (what to say to an insurance adjuster).
  5. Get a free case review. A lawyer can arrange testing both sides can rely on, work out who is responsible and check your deadline; get any fee agreement in writing (how injury lawyers get paid). Get a free case review, or, if you were hurt in Michigan, compare Michigan injury lawyers.

What waiting can cost

  • The evidence. A product that’s repaired, used, thrown out or taken apart without notice may no longer prove anything, and in Michigan, failing to keep it can lead to sanctions against you (Brenner v Kolk).
  • Your right to sue. In Michigan, generally 3 years from the injury (MCL 600.5805(12)).
  • Warranty remedies. A buyer who doesn’t notify the seller within a reasonable time can be barred from any remedy (MCL 440.2607(3)(a)).

What a good outcome looks like

The product is examined in a way both sides can check, the flaw is found or fairly inferred, and the claim is filed against everyone responsible in time. Those responsible pay your medical bills and lost income and compensate you for what you went through, and you know what you’ll take home before you sign anything. From wondering whether it was bad luck or your own fault to knowing what went wrong with your unit, who answers for it and how long you have to act.

For more on defective products, drugs and toxic exposure, browse the defective product and toxic exposure guides.

Frequently asked questions

What is a manufacturing defect?

A flaw that happens in production, so your unit, or a batch, doesn't match the maker's own design while other units of the same product are fine. The Michigan Supreme Court has said that in a manufacturing-defect case, the product 'may be evaluated against the manufacturer's own production standards, as manifested by that manufacturer's other like products' (Prentis v Yale Manufacturing Co, 1984). A flaw built into the design of every unit is a design defect instead.

How do you prove a manufacturing defect?

Usually with the product itself, examined and tested by an expert and compared with the maker's specifications and properly made units, along with recall notices, other people's reports and the circumstances of the failure. You generally must show the product was defective when it left the defendant's control and that the defect caused your injury (in Michigan, M Civ JI 25.22, 25.32). In Michigan, you can use direct or circumstantial evidence and don't have to eliminate every other possible cause, but the evidence must support reasonable inferences, not speculation (Holloway v General Motors Corp, 1978; Skinner v Square D Co, 1994).

Can you still sue if the product was destroyed or thrown away?

Sometimes. The Connecticut Supreme Court noted in 2011 that most states have adopted some form of the 'malfunction theory,' which lets a plaintiff build a case on circumstantial evidence when direct evidence of a defect is unavailable, though proof of an accident alone isn't enough (Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co v Deere & Co). Michigan allows a defect to be proved with circumstantial evidence (Holloway v General Motors Corp, 1978). But if you lost or threw away evidence you knew or should have known was relevant, a Michigan court can sanction you, for example by excluding evidence or telling the jury it may infer the missing evidence would have been unfavorable (Brenner v Kolk, 1997).

Should you let the manufacturer or its insurer inspect the product?

Not by handing it over on your own. Get advice first, and have any inspection or testing done with everyone on notice, because testing can change the product for good. In one Michigan case, experts hired by the people suing took a rider's new motorcycle apart without the other side present and skipped a measurement that could never be repeated, and the dismissal of the lawsuit was upheld (Bloemendaal v Town & Country Sports, Inc, 2002).

Can you sue the store that sold you the defective product?

Sometimes, but in Michigan it takes more than showing the product was defective. A seller that didn't make the product is liable only if it failed to use reasonable care, including breach of any implied warranty, and that failure was a proximate cause of your injury, or if it made an express warranty that the product failed to meet and that failure was a proximate cause of your harm (MCL 600.2947(6)). The Court of Appeals has held that implied warranty isn't a separate claim against such a seller: to win on it, you must show the seller failed to use reasonable care (Curry v Meijer, Inc, 2009).

How long do you have to sue for a manufacturing defect in Michigan?

Generally 3 years from the injury (MCL 600.5805(12), 600.5827). There's no general rule that delays the start because you learned the cause later (Trentadue v Buckler Automatic Lawn Sprinkler Co, 2007), but a claim for breach of a warranty of quality or fitness, including an implied-warranty product claim, starts when the breach is discovered or reasonably should have been (MCL 600.5833; Cullender v BASF Wyandotte Corp, 1985), and if someone liable fraudulently concealed the claim, you have 2 years from when you discovered it or should have (MCL 600.5855). Someone injured as a child has until a year after turning 18 if that's later (MCL 600.5851(1)). After a product has been in use 10 years, you can still sue, but you must prove your case 'without the benefit of any presumption' (MCL 600.5805(12)). If you bought the product, notify the seller within a reasonable time after you discover the problem, or should have, or you can be barred from any warranty remedy (MCL 440.2607(3)(a)).

Sources

  1. Prentis v Yale Manufacturing Co, 421 Mich 670 (1984) · Caselaw Access Project, Harvard Law School
  2. Holloway v General Motors Corp (On Rehearing), 403 Mich 614 (1978) · Caselaw Access Project, Harvard Law School
  3. Skinner v Square D Co, 445 Mich 153 (1994) · Caselaw Access Project, Harvard Law School
  4. Trentadue v Buckler Automatic Lawn Sprinkler Co, 479 Mich 378 (2007) · Caselaw Access Project, Harvard Law School
  5. Brenner v Kolk, 226 Mich App 149 (1997) · Caselaw Access Project, Harvard Law School
  6. Bloemendaal v Town & Country Sports, Inc, 255 Mich App 207 (2002) · Caselaw Access Project, Harvard Law School
  7. Curry v Meijer, Inc, 286 Mich App 586 (2009) · Caselaw Access Project, Harvard Law School
  8. Cullender v BASF Wyandotte Corp, 146 Mich App 423 (1985) · Caselaw Access Project, Harvard Law School
  9. Myrlak v Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, 157 N.J. 84 (1999) · Caselaw Access Project, Harvard Law School
  10. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co v Deere & Co, 302 Conn. 123 (2011) · Caselaw Access Project, Harvard Law School
  11. MCL 600.2945, Product liability definitions · Michigan Legislature
  12. MCL 600.2946, Product liability action; admissible evidence · Michigan Legislature
  13. MCL 600.2947, Product liability action; liability of manufacturer or seller · Michigan Legislature
  14. MCL 600.2955, Scientific or expert opinion or evidence; admissibility · Michigan Legislature
  15. MCL 600.2959, Comparative fault; reduced damages · Michigan Legislature
  16. MCL 600.5805, Period of limitations for injuries to persons or property · Michigan Legislature
  17. MCL 600.5827, Accrual of claim · Michigan Legislature
  18. MCL 600.5833, Accrual of claim; breach of warranty of quality or fitness · Michigan Legislature
  19. MCL 600.5851, Claims of minors; year of grace · Michigan Legislature
  20. MCL 600.5855, Fraudulent concealment of a claim · Michigan Legislature
  21. MCL 440.2314, Implied warranty of merchantability · Michigan Legislature
  22. MCL 440.2607, Acceptance of goods; notice of breach · Michigan Legislature
  23. Michigan Model Civil Jury Instructions (updated July 21, 2026): M Civ JI 25.22, 25.31 and 25.32 · Michigan Supreme Court
  24. Ohio Rev. Code § 2307.74, Product defective in manufacture or construction · Ohio Legislative Service Commission
  25. 15 U.S.C. § 2055a, Publicly available consumer product safety information database · Office of the Law Revision Counsel, U.S. House of Representatives
  26. Possible Improvements to SaferProducts.gov; Request for Information and Notice of Public Hearing, 84 Fed. Reg. 3134 (Feb. 11, 2019) · U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (Federal Register)
  27. Consumer complaints data file: description (CMPL.txt) · National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Office of Defects Investigation
  28. 49 C.F.R. § 573.15, Public availability of motor vehicle recall information · Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, Office of the Federal Register
  29. Products liability (Wex legal dictionary) · Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
  30. Restatement of the Law (Wex legal dictionary) · Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School

Updated September 28, 2026

This guide is general information, not legal advice, and laws change. For advice about your situation, talk to a lawyer licensed in your state. Reading this page or contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Free case review

Hurt? Get a straight answer about your case.

Tell us what happened in four quick questions. We connect you with a lawyer who handles cases like yours, at no cost and with no obligation.

  • Free, with no obligation to hire anyone
  • Matched with a lawyer who handles your type of case
  • About two minutes, on your phone or computer

Prefer to talk? Call 1-800-LAWSUIT.