Slip, fall and unsafe property

Complete Premises Liability Guide

By Million Dollar Lawyer Editorial Team · Updated

An older woman with a cane stands at the foot of an old staircase, one hand on the post, looking up at a broken wall handrail

You were hurt on someone else’s property. Maybe a stair gave way at a friend’s house, a railing broke at your apartment, or someone attacked you in a dark parking garage. Now you’re wondering whether the owner has to pay.

Sometimes they do. Premises liability makes whoever controls a property responsible when they fail to use reasonable care about a dangerous condition they knew about, or should have found, and it hurts someone. Whether you have a claim usually turns on why you were there, what the owner knew, and whether you meet the deadlines, which in Michigan can be as short as 120 days for a defective public road, sidewalk or building. Michigan’s rules are in the boxes marked “In Michigan.”

Hurt and not sure where you stand? Get a free case review. Four quick questions, no cost, no obligation.

What is premises liability?

Premises liability is a kind of personal injury claim based on negligence: failing to use the care a reasonable person would use. It covers injuries caused by the condition of land or buildings, from a loose handrail to a broken pool drain or a dark, unlocked stairwell. Getting hurt on someone’s property doesn’t by itself make the owner responsible. The law asks whether the owner acted reasonably, not whether the property was perfectly safe.

Who is responsible when you’re hurt on someone else’s property?

Usually whoever controlled the property when you were hurt, which isn’t always the owner: a business that leases its store, a landlord for shared hallways and parking lots, a condominium association for its common areas, a homeowner, or a government agency, which has special rules (below). A contractor that created a hazard, or the maker of a defective product, can share the blame.

Does it matter why you were on the property?

In many states, including Michigan, yes. The traditional rules sort visitors into three groups, each owed a different level of care. Here is how the Michigan Supreme Court describes them (Stitt v Holland Abundant Life Fellowship, 2000):

Visitor Who usually fits What the owner owes
Invitee Customers and others there for a business purpose Reasonable care: inspect the property, and repair or warn about the dangers it finds
Licensee Social guests and others there with permission for their own reasons A warning about hidden dangers the owner knows or has reason to know of, if you don’t know or have reason to know of them; no duty to inspect or make the place safe
Trespasser People there without permission Very little: mainly, not to injure you by “wilful and wanton” misconduct

States differ in two ways:

  • Public invitees. The Restatement (Second) of Torts, an influential summary of the law, also counts members of the public on land open to them, such as a churchgoer, as invitees (§ 332). In 2000, the Michigan Supreme Court noted that most states to consider it had adopted this rule. Michigan didn’t (Stitt).
  • No categories. Some states ask only whether the owner acted reasonably. California’s Supreme Court made that change in 1968, saying a visitor’s status “is not determinative” (Rowland v. Christian), and New York’s highest court followed in 1976 (Basso v. Miller). Illinois merged invitees and licensees by statute but kept separate rules for trespassers (740 ILCS 130/2, 130/3). The newer Restatement (Third) of Torts also uses one general duty of reasonable care, except for “flagrant trespassers” (as described in Kandil-Elsayed).

What if you were trespassing, or a child was?

Trespassers are owed the least, but there are exceptions, especially for children. Under the attractive nuisance doctrine, an owner can be liable when a trespassing child is hurt by a dangerous man-made condition the owner knew or had reason to know children were likely to reach, if the child was too young to see the risk and removing the danger would have cost little compared with the risk (Restatement (Second) of Torts § 339, as summarized by Cornell’s Legal Information Institute). See how the attractive nuisance doctrine protects children.

Did the owner know, or should they have known, about the danger?

This question, called notice, decides many premises cases. Actual notice means the owner or its employees knew, for example from a complaint or a work order. Constructive notice means they should have known, because the danger was noticeable enough, or had been there long enough, that a reasonably careful owner would have found it. If the owner’s own staff created the danger, you usually don’t need separate proof that they knew about it. Depending on the circumstances, a clear warning can be part of reasonable care.

Yellow wet-floor caution sign on a shiny floor while a worker mops behind it

What if the danger was open and obvious?

An open and obvious danger is one an average person would notice on a casual look. Traditionally, an owner isn’t liable to invitees for such a danger “unless the possessor should anticipate the harm despite such knowledge or obviousness” (Restatement (Second) of Torts § 343A, as quoted in Kandil-Elsayed). The newer Restatement treats obviousness as bearing on “whether reasonable care was employed,” not as the end of the case. States differ.

Snow and ice raise their own questions. In Michigan, an owner must take “reasonable measures within a reasonable time” after snow and ice build up to reduce the hazard to invitees (M Civ JI 19.05). For falls in detail, see how slip-and-fall claims work.

Person in winter boots falling backward in the snow

How does your own share of the blame affect a claim?

Owners and insurers often argue that you caused your own injury. In many states, including Michigan, being partly at fault reduces what you recover instead of ending the claim. A few places still follow contributory negligence, which can bar recovery for any fault of your own; Maryland’s highest court declined to abandon it in 2013 (Coleman v. Soccer Ass’n of Columbia). See how fault is divided in each state.

What kinds of premises liability claims are there?

Premises liability covers far more than falls. The same questions apply to each type (who controlled the property, why you were there, what the owner knew), and each has its own guide.

Slips, trips and falls

Wet floors, broken steps, uneven pavement, poor lighting and ice. These cases usually turn on notice and on how quickly the owner cleaned up, repaired or warned. See slip-and-fall claims and common causes of slips and falls.

Negligent security

Assaults and robberies at apartment complexes, parking lots, hotels, bars and stores, where the claim is that the owner failed to take reasonable steps against crime. See negligent security claims.

Dog bites

Dog-bite rules vary by state. Some, like Michigan’s, make the owner responsible without proof that the dog was dangerous before. See dog bite claims, and if a dog attacked your pet, who pays when a dog injures another dog.

Swimming pools

Pool cases can involve missing or broken fences and gates, diving injuries and drain entrapment. Federal law requires public pools and spas, including those at hotels, apartment complexes and clubs, to have anti-entrapment drain covers or systems that meet a safety standard (15 U.S.C. § 8003(c)). See swimming pool injury claims and, if someone died, how wrongful death claims work.

Elevators, fires, hotels and amusement parks

  • Elevators and escalators. The owner, a maintenance contractor and the manufacturer can each be responsible. Michigan requires elevators to be built, maintained and used according to the A17.1 elevator safety code and state rules (MCL 408.806). See elevator accident claims.
  • Fires. Claims often involve missing smoke alarms, blocked exits, faulty wiring or code violations. By law, a Michigan residential landlord promises to follow applicable health and safety laws (MCL 554.139(1)(b)). See fire and burn injury claims.
  • Hotels and resorts. Guests are business visitors, owed the most care under the traditional rules. See injury claims against hotels.
  • Amusement parks. The park, the ride operator, the manufacturer and maintenance contractors may share responsibility; Michigan’s licensing department regulates rides (MCL 408.652(b), 408.656). See amusement park injury claims.

What does a landlord owe tenants and their guests?

A landlord usually controls the shared parts of a building, such as stairways, hallways, laundry rooms and parking lots, so dangers there are usually its responsibility. Inside your own unit, it depends more on your state’s law, your lease and what the landlord knew. Report hazards in writing and keep a copy.

Not sure who controlled the place where you were hurt? Get a free case review. Four quick questions, no cost, no obligation.

What if the property belongs to the government?

Government bodies are often immune from injury lawsuits, with narrow exceptions, and they may need written notice within months. If a public road, sidewalk, park or building was involved, find out the rules right away, and see dangerous property condition claims.

For what Michigan’s 2023 change to the open-and-obvious rule means for a fall today, see Michigan premises liability after Kandil-Elsayed.

How long do you have to file a premises liability claim?

Every state sets a statute of limitations, the deadline to file a lawsuit, and government claims often need written notice much sooner. Miss either and the claim can be lost, however strong it is.

What evidence proves a premises liability claim?

Premises evidence tends to disappear: hazards get repaired, video gets recorded over and records get thrown out. Start collecting now:

  • Photos and video of the danger from several angles, before it changes, plus the lighting and any warning signs. Ask the owner in writing to keep any security footage.
  • The incident report. Report what happened to a manager or landlord, in writing if you can, and ask for a copy.
  • Witnesses: names and phone numbers of anyone who saw it happen or knew about the danger, including employees.
  • Records: the owner’s inspection and cleaning logs, work orders and earlier complaints, plus public inspection reports, code violations and, after a crime, police reports and past calls to the property.
  • Proof of who was in control: the lease, a management contract, or a condo association’s master deed and bylaws.
  • Your injuries: medical records and bills, photos as you heal, and a short daily note of your pain and what you can’t do.

A lawyer can send a preservation letter, a formal request that the owner keep this evidence. Be careful with the owner’s insurer: you don’t have to give it a recorded statement, and it’s safer not to until you’ve had advice. For falls, see what to do after a slip and fall.

What is a premises liability claim worth?

There’s no reliable “average.” Value depends on how badly you were hurt, lost pay, how strong the proof of notice is, any share of fault assigned to you, how much insurance is available, and whether every deadline was met. Economic damages are losses you can add up, like medical bills and lost wages. Noneconomic damages cover harm without a receipt, like pain and suffering. See what drives slip-and-fall settlement value.

Who pays? Usually the responsible party’s liability insurance. In Michigan, a homeowners policy typically includes liability coverage and premises medical coverage, which “pays the medical expenses of others accidentally injured on your property.” But no law requires homeowners insurance, though mortgage lenders do (Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services), so an uninsured owner can make a claim harder to collect. In Michigan, an injury lawyer’s contingency fee can’t be more than one-third of the recovery after case costs (MCR 8.121); see how personal injury lawyers get paid.

What to do next

  1. Get medical care, and tell every provider how you were hurt. It protects your health and creates a record linking the injury to the property.
  2. Report it and save the evidence today. Report the injury in writing, photograph the danger, collect witness names and ask in writing for video and records to be kept.
  3. Find out who controlled the property, and whether it’s public. If a Michigan government road, sidewalk or building was involved, the 120-day notice clock is already running.
  4. Be careful what you say and sign. Stick to the facts with the owner’s insurer, hold off on a recorded statement until you’ve had advice, and don’t sign a release before you know how badly you’re hurt; a signed release generally ends the claim.
  5. Talk to a lawyer well before the first deadline. Get a free case review, or compare Michigan injury lawyers. For every Michigan rule in one place, see the Michigan personal injury law reference.

What waiting can cost

  • Evidence. Dangers get fixed, footage gets recorded over and witnesses move on.
  • A claim against the government. In Michigan, notice of a road, sidewalk or public-building defect is due within 120 days; a notice served on day 140 ended the claim in Rowland.
  • The right to sue. Most Michigan premises lawsuits must be filed within three years of the injury (MCL 600.5805(2)).
  • Your side of the story. An early recorded statement or social media post can be used to blame you for the injury.

What a good outcome looks like

The person or business that controlled the property answers for the danger it should have fixed. Your medical bills and lost pay are covered, and any share of fault assigned to you matches what actually happened, not an adjuster’s first guess. Every notice goes out on time, and before you sign anything, you know what you’ll take home. From wondering whether the owner has to pay for your injury to knowing what they owed you, what they knew and how long you have to act.

For more guides on injuries caused by unsafe property, browse slip, fall and unsafe property claims.

Frequently asked questions

What do you have to prove in a premises liability case?

Generally, that whoever controlled the property owed you a duty, failed to use reasonable care about a dangerous condition it knew about or should have found, and that this caused your injury and losses. In Michigan, the four elements are duty, breach, causation and harm, and you must show the owner had actual or constructive notice of the danger (Kandil-Elsayed v F & E Oil, 2023; Lowrey v LMPS & LMPJ, 2016).

Is a social guest an invitee or a licensee in Michigan?

A licensee. Michigan's model jury instruction says 'A social guest is a licensee, not an invitee' (M Civ JI 19.01). The owner must warn a licensee about hidden dangers it knows or has reason to know of, if the guest doesn't know or have reason to know of them, but has no duty to inspect or make the property safe for the visit (Stitt v Holland Abundant Life Fellowship, 2000). On May 22, 2026, the Michigan Supreme Court agreed to reconsider the invitee and licensee categories; as of September 2026 it had not ruled.

Can I still sue if the danger was open and obvious?

In Michigan, often yes. Since Kandil-Elsayed v F & E Oil (July 28, 2023), an obvious danger bears on whether the owner acted reasonably and on your share of fault, instead of meaning the owner owed you no duty. A social guest is owed a warning only about dangers they had no reason to know of, so an obvious danger may still defeat a guest's claim (M Civ JI 19.06).

How long do I have to file a premises liability claim in Michigan?

Usually three years from the injury (MCL 600.5805(2)). If a government road, sidewalk or public building caused the injury, written notice is due within 120 days (180 days for a child hurt on a road or sidewalk), and a highway lawsuit within two years (MCL 691.1404, 691.1406, 691.1411(2)). Other injury claims against the State need a sworn claim or notice filed with the Court of Claims within six months (MCL 600.6431(2), (4)).

Can I sue my landlord for an injury at my apartment complex in Michigan?

Possibly. Every residential lease includes the landlord's promises that the premises and common areas are 'fit for the use intended by the parties' and that the premises will be kept in reasonable repair (MCL 554.139(1)). Tenants are also invitees of the landlord in common areas (Janini v London Townhouses Condominium Ass'n, 2024). Only the parties to the lease can sue on its promises; a visitor relies on ordinary premises rules (Allison v AEW Capital Management, 2008).

Is a store responsible if someone attacks me on its property?

In Michigan, only in narrow circumstances. A business has no general duty to anticipate and prevent crimes or to hire security. Its duty is to respond reasonably, by expediting police involvement, to a situation on the premises that poses a risk of imminent and foreseeable harm to an identifiable customer (MacDonald v PKT, 2001). Landlords owe the same limited duty in common areas (Bailey v Schaaf, 2013).

Sources

  1. Kandil-Elsayed v F & E Oil, Inc; Pinsky v Kroger Co of Mich, 512 Mich 95 (decided July 28, 2023) · Michigan Supreme Court
  2. Stitt v Holland Abundant Life Fellowship, 462 Mich 591 (2000) · Michigan Supreme Court, via CourtListener
  3. Michigan Model Civil Jury Instructions, Chapter 19: Premises Liability, M Civ JI 19.01-19.11 (updated July 21, 2026) · Michigan Supreme Court, Committee on Model Civil Jury Instructions
  4. Molitoris v Saint Mary Magdalen Catholic Church, No. 166699, order granting leave to appeal (May 22, 2026) · Michigan Supreme Court
  5. Lowrey v LMPS & LMPJ, Inc, 500 Mich 1 (2016) · Michigan Supreme Court, via Justia
  6. Kubczak v Chemical Bank & Trust Co, 456 Mich 653 (1998) · Michigan Supreme Court, via CourtListener
  7. Janini v London Townhouses Condominium Ass'n (Docket No. 164158, decided July 11, 2024) · Michigan Supreme Court
  8. Bowerman v Red Oak Management Co, Inc (Docket No. 167718, decided July 20, 2026) · Michigan Supreme Court
  9. Allison v AEW Capital Management, LLP, 481 Mich 419 (2008) · Michigan Supreme Court
  10. MacDonald v PKT, Inc, 464 Mich 322 (2001) · Michigan Supreme Court, via CourtListener
  11. Bailey v Schaaf, 494 Mich 595 (2013) · Michigan Supreme Court
  12. Rowland v Washtenaw County Road Commission, 477 Mich 197 (2007) · Michigan Supreme Court, via CourtListener
  13. Mann v City of Detroit, No. 166619, order (June 11, 2025) · Michigan Supreme Court
  14. Rowland v. Christian, 69 Cal.2d 108 (1968) · Supreme Court of California, via Stanford Law School (SCOCAL)
  15. Basso v Miller, 40 N.Y.2d 233 (1976) · New York Court of Appeals, via the New York State Law Reporting Bureau
  16. 740 ILCS 130/2, Premises Liability Act: invitees and licensees · Illinois General Assembly
  17. 740 ILCS 130/3, Premises Liability Act: trespassers · Illinois General Assembly
  18. Coleman v. Soccer Association of Columbia (Md. Court of Appeals, July 9, 2013) · Maryland Judiciary
  19. Attractive nuisance doctrine · Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School
  20. 15 U.S.C. § 8003, Federal swimming pool and spa drain cover standard · Office of the Law Revision Counsel, U.S. House of Representatives
  21. MCL 600.2959, Comparative fault; reduced damages · Michigan Legislature
  22. MCL 600.2955a, Impairment by alcohol or a controlled substance as an absolute defense · Michigan Legislature
  23. MCL 600.5805, Injuries to persons or property; period of limitations · Michigan Legislature
  24. MCL 600.5851, Claims by minors and people unable to understand their rights · Michigan Legislature
  25. MCL 554.139, Residential leases; covenants of fitness and repair · Michigan Legislature
  26. MCL 554.583, Trespass liability act: duty of care to trespassers · Michigan Legislature
  27. MCL 324.73301, Liability of landowners to people using land for outdoor recreation · Michigan Legislature
  28. MCL 287.351, Person bitten by dog; liability of owner · Michigan Legislature
  29. MCL 691.1401, Governmental tort liability act: definitions · Michigan Legislature
  30. MCL 691.1402, Highway exception to governmental immunity · Michigan Legislature
  31. MCL 691.1402a, Municipal sidewalks · Michigan Legislature
  32. MCL 691.1403, Defective highways; knowledge of the defect · Michigan Legislature
  33. MCL 691.1404, Notice of injury and defect in a highway · Michigan Legislature
  34. MCL 691.1406, Public buildings; dangerous conditions; notice of injury · Michigan Legislature
  35. MCL 691.1407, Governmental immunity from tort liability · Michigan Legislature
  36. MCL 691.1411, Claims against government agencies; limitation of actions · Michigan Legislature
  37. MCL 600.6431, Court of Claims; notice of intention to file a claim · Michigan Legislature
  38. MCL 408.806, Elevators; compliance with the safety code and board rules · Michigan Legislature
  39. MCL 408.652, Carnival-amusement safety act of 1966: definitions · Michigan Legislature
  40. MCL 408.656, Carnival-amusement safety act of 1966: rules for ride safety and inspection · Michigan Legislature
  41. MCR 8.121, Contingent fees in claims for personal injury, wrongful death and no-fault benefits (Michigan Court Rules, updated July 31, 2026) · Michigan Supreme Court
  42. Your Guide to Homeowners Insurance: For Michigan Consumers · Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services
  43. Walter v City of Flint, 40 Mich App 613 (1972) · Michigan Court of Appeals, via the Caselaw Access Project (Harvard Law School)

Updated September 25, 2026

This guide is general information, not legal advice, and laws change. For advice about your situation, talk to a lawyer licensed in your state. Reading this page or contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Free case review

Hurt? Get a straight answer about your case.

Tell us what happened in four quick questions. We connect you with a lawyer who handles cases like yours, at no cost and with no obligation.

  • Free, with no obligation to hire anyone
  • Matched with a lawyer who handles your type of case
  • About two minutes, on your phone or computer

Prefer to talk? Call 1-800-LAWSUIT.